| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:06:30 +0100
|
| 5 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> The reason why I think that < dependencies are not bad is that |
| 7 |
> existing users of such packages will typically simply miss out on |
| 8 |
> upgrades. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No, what will happen is that Portage will perform the upgrades anyway
|
| 11 |
and break things, since it doesn't check dependencies of installed
|
| 12 |
packages that aren't part of the resolution.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- --
|
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlCQUB8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFJUwCgiTEeYHRcz+AkQh/X0MI978OC
|
| 20 |
T24An0txxAh3T7u95c3nr9KUEnAcDIb/
|
| 21 |
=sCDP
|
| 22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives