Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:02:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20580.60366.622706.627627@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 by Brian Harring |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | tl;dr |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Shorter version; you very clearly left out option C; "leave it as is |
| 6 | > since PMS is filled with warts, this isn't hurting anything, and |
| 7 | > changing it will break things." |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Problems aren't solved by ignoring them. ;-) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | The point is that currently PMS and Portage behaviour disagree. |
| 12 | I think this is not acceptable, otherwise we could as well give up on |
| 13 | the PMS and take the Portage implementation as the reference. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |