1 |
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:38:34 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 08:03 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:33:09 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:43:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On Sun, 2019-06-16 at 23:00 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > Only active Gentoo developers who are also Foundation members may be |
8 |
> > > > > > nominated. [1] |
9 |
> > > > > > |
10 |
> > > > > > Nominations MUST be made by posting to gentoo-nfp@l.g.o, and |
11 |
> > > > > > the nominated candidate must accept not later than the end of the |
12 |
> > > > > > nomination period. |
13 |
> > > > > |
14 |
> > > > > Ok, let's try someone else. I nominate: |
15 |
> > > > > |
16 |
> > > > > David Seifert (soap) |
17 |
> > > > > Mikle Kolyada (zlogene) |
18 |
> > > > |
19 |
> > > > You violated the rules: |
20 |
> > > > Nominations MUST be made by posting to gentoo-nfp@l.g.o |
21 |
> > > > |
22 |
> > > > But you sent them to gentoo-project@l.g.o mail list. |
23 |
> > > > Hereby they are not valid. Please perform your duty properly and |
24 |
> > > > send nominations to the aforementioned NFP mail list. |
25 |
> > > > |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > You could also have understood it was a honest mistake and be nice about |
28 |
> > > it. But I suppose that's too much to expect from a ComRel member. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I politely pointed out your mistake and nicely asked you to fix it. |
31 |
> > I even used the word "please". I honestly don't see what was not |
32 |
> > nice about my previous e-mail. Maybe we have a language barrier |
33 |
> > issue here. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > My comrel membership has nothing to do with this discussion and |
36 |
> > I'm participating in it as a common Gentoo developer with my comrel |
37 |
> > hat off. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> |
40 |
> Do you really believe that a ComRel member (read: a person whose duty |
41 |
> involves judging other people's behavior) can just take ComRel hat off |
42 |
> and stop caring about providing exemplary behavior? |
43 |
|
44 |
I do believe that I am free to express my private opinion on any |
45 |
public subject as long as such expression is within common sense |
46 |
communication requirements, e.g. contains no obscene language, |
47 |
humiliation or intentional misinformation and so on. |
48 |
|
49 |
> Following that |
50 |
> logic, I could join ComRel claiming that all the things I've said |
51 |
> and done were 'with my comrel hat off' (since I don't have any)! |
52 |
> |
53 |
> I understand that there might be a language barrier. However, since you |
54 |
> decide to perform a very specific and important role, I'm afraid you |
55 |
> need to learn to use English in a way that's actually polite rather than |
56 |
> using the excuse of a language barrier. |
57 |
|
58 |
The language barrier works both ways. As far as I know English is |
59 |
not your native language. |
60 |
|
61 |
> Let me explain. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> A neutral (i.e. not really polite but acceptable) way of saying that |
64 |
> would be to say 'you have posted the nominations to the wrong list'. |
65 |
> That's plain and factual. |
66 |
> |
67 |
> You said 'you violated the rules' which is an accusation. |
68 |
|
69 |
First and foremost this is the plain statement of the fact. As the |
70 |
QA team member you have to understand that rules are the same for |
71 |
everyone. Requiring special treatment is not fair to fellow |
72 |
developers. |
73 |
|
74 |
> Accusations |
75 |
> tend to render one as guilty of doing something very bad. Accusations |
76 |
> are not polite. |
77 |
> |
78 |
> Furthermore, 'perform your duty properly' is passive aggressive. |
79 |
|
80 |
The Oxford dictionary contains different definition of the |
81 |
"passive-aggressive": |
82 |
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/passive-aggressive |
83 |
|
84 |
Let me quote it: |
85 |
|
86 |
"Definition of passive-aggressive in English: |
87 |
passive-aggressive |
88 |
adjective |
89 |
|
90 |
Of or denoting a type of behaviour or personality characterized by |
91 |
indirect resistance to the demands of others and an avoidance of |
92 |
direct confrontation." |
93 |
|
94 |
Excuse me, but I trust the Oxford dictionary more. |
95 |
|
96 |
Interesting, that your response to my initial message fits well in |
97 |
the definition quoted above. |
98 |
|
99 |
Best regards, |
100 |
Andrew Savchenko |