| 1 |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Manuel Rüger <mrueg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 07/17/2014 03:16 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Why is there any mapping between id and developer name (or why have |
| 7 |
>> the election officials access to this mapping... by definition it's |
| 8 |
>> already a non-anonymous election then)? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That's a valid point. Can an election official reply to it, please? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> This is not meant in an offensive way, I'd just like to understand the |
| 14 |
> workflow of the election. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Probably worth noting that even if we keep election officials blind, |
| 17 |
Infra will still have access by virtue of having root on the |
| 18 |
directories containing the ballots. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That would be solved by my proposal, potentially, but it is purely |
| 21 |
vaporware now... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives