| 1 |
On 06/29/2013 06:33 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/25/2013 03:25 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:> On 06/16/2013 07:24 PM, |
| 3 |
> Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> I'm using the same thread, I'd like to nominate: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> patrick |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I accept. And as soon as I'm less distracted with life I'll be a bit |
| 9 |
>> more verbose :) |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Although you might answer that question in your manifesto, I just take |
| 14 |
> the liberty to ask here: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Do you think the git migration is a good thing and will improve |
| 18 |
> contributions and workflow? Will you support it? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Good thing - well. Hmm. It'll make a few things marginally easier, and a |
| 22 |
few things a lot harder. So that adds up to "Meh" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It'll force people to adapt to new and exciting workflows (and |
| 25 |
excitement is not something I demand), but I guess people are in need of |
| 26 |
Change. |
| 27 |
(What's more fun than having 4 unsynchronized checkouts and |
| 28 |
cross-merging between them?) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
As long as people will document things, be prepared to fix the random |
| 31 |
breakage that will happen (ey, git lost its head, now what?), etc. etc. |
| 32 |
... I'm pretty much indifferent. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Should people try to change things and not document things (thus trying |
| 35 |
to make my life more difficult) I'll do what I can to be lazy and get in |
| 36 |
their way, fair is fair :) |
Archives