1 |
On 2019.07.01 10:52, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 10:31 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2019.07.01 08:50, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sun, 2019-06-30 at 17:55 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 05:54:35PM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 01:49:58AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel |
7 |
> > > wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > > > Isn't it about time we quit pinning the mistakes of the |
9 |
> past |
10 |
> > > on the |
11 |
> > > > > > > officers of the present? |
12 |
> > > > > > |
13 |
> > > > > > Well, yes. Though, we tried something in the past, it didnt |
14 |
> > > work, we should do |
15 |
> > > > > > it different in the future. |
16 |
> > > > > > |
17 |
> > > > > > > From what I understand, the present and recent |
18 |
> > > > > > > officers have made extraordinary efforts to rectify the |
19 |
> > > shortcomings of |
20 |
> > > > > > > previous trustees |
21 |
> > > > > > |
22 |
> > > > > > And that's great. |
23 |
> > > > > > |
24 |
> > > > > > But are you sure that we should require continuous |
25 |
> > > "extraordinary efforts" |
26 |
> > > > > > from trustees in the future, just to keep things running? |
27 |
> > > > > > |
28 |
> > > > > > FWIW, I endorse antarus / Alec for trustee. :) |
29 |
> > > > |
30 |
> > > > No, once fixed, the books will likely be continued to be done by |
31 |
> a |
32 |
> > > full time CPA. |
33 |
> > > |
34 |
> > > Wouldn't a dedicated 'full time CPA' be more expensive than an |
35 |
> > > umbrella |
36 |
> > > that has a financial team for multiple projects? |
37 |
> > > |
38 |
> > > -- |
39 |
> > > Best regards, |
40 |
> > > Michał Górny |
41 |
> > > |
42 |
> > > |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > Ah, the nuances of the English language used between two non |
45 |
> > native spears. |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > A 'full time CPA' means that the person does that sort of work full |
48 |
> > time. It does not mean that he or she works full time for any one |
49 |
> > client. |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Yes, I understand that. However, I still believe that a contract |
53 |
> initiated between CPA and a single small-ish entity such a Gentoo |
54 |
> involves more costs than fees taken by umbrella dedicated to multiple |
55 |
> entities. Please correct me if I'm wrong. |
56 |
|
57 |
Nobody knows yet. Different umbrellas work differently. Different CPAs |
58 |
charge differently and perform different scopes of work. |
59 |
The Foundation will need to perform a value judgement based on |
60 |
quotations not beliefs. |
61 |
|
62 |
Its not all for the Foundation to decide. We have to find an umbrella to |
63 |
have us before dissolving the Foundation is even an option. |
64 |
|
65 |
> |
66 |
> While I can agree that we need to pay more at the moment due to past |
67 |
> issues, I also believe that we owe it to our donors that we try not to |
68 |
> spend most of their money on unnecessary bureaucracy (read: keeping |
69 |
> a dedicated Foundation if there's an alternative that works for |
70 |
> Gentoo). |
71 |
|
72 |
Yes. That's what due diligence is partly about, ensuring the Foundation |
73 |
gets value for money. |
74 |
|
75 |
> |
76 |
> -- |
77 |
> Best regards, |
78 |
> Michał Górny |
79 |
> |
80 |
> |
81 |
|
82 |
-- |
83 |
Regards, |
84 |
|
85 |
Roy Bamford |
86 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
87 |
elections |
88 |
gentoo-ops |
89 |
forum-mods |
90 |
arm64 |