1 |
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 15:01 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:15:37AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hello, everyone. |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > Gentoo is technically led by two bodies -- the Council and the Trustees. |
7 |
> > > While this somewhat works for many years, people have repeatedly pointed |
8 |
> > > out that it's far from perfect and that it is preventing Gentoo from |
9 |
> > > gaining more popularity. Some of them are looking into the times of |
10 |
> > > BDFL with longing, others are considering it the worst thing ever. |
11 |
> > > Nevertheless, there are problems with the current state of things. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> The problem with the bylaws is that the Trustees control them, |
15 |
> and aren't interested in doing anything that would actively limit their |
16 |
> claimed power. I mean, they've even rejected clarifying the 'Trustees |
17 |
> can kick Foundation members at their leisure' rule. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
No, the trustees do not exclusively control the by-laws. Even the |
21 |
foundation has checks and balances. The same approach of the general |
22 |
resolution for the council is in place within the foundation. |
23 |
|
24 |
What is it that needs clarified regarding Section 5.6? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Cheers, |
28 |
Aaron |