1 |
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:58:42 PM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Maybe it did. I can't vouch for this statement either way, because |
4 |
> I'm in group #1. |
5 |
|
6 |
Anyone can learn about the past. Just read the posts on -nfp, and then my bug. |
7 |
It all took place publicly. There are not many posts on -nfp, it started in |
8 |
August. I provided links in my first post.... |
9 |
|
10 |
> Well, if you have a problem with how Comrel is handling your case |
11 |
> today, I suggest you appeal it. |
12 |
|
13 |
Appeal what? Comrel entirely? What would I be appealing? |
14 |
|
15 |
I have asked that question several times and no one has answered that. It also |
16 |
seems before appeal I need to request a full vote by comrel. The entire |
17 |
situation is not clear to me.... |
18 |
|
19 |
> That is really all I can do in my |
20 |
> position in group #1. If you appeal, I'll join group #2, and still |
21 |
> won't be able to comment here on what happened, but I'd get a vote in |
22 |
> whether you'd be allowed back. |
23 |
|
24 |
Appeal what? Seriously! |
25 |
|
26 |
> It would be on-topic in a private email to Comrel, or in an appeal to |
27 |
> the Council. |
28 |
|
29 |
I have never been treated fairly by comrel. The interaction with comrel has |
30 |
never been good since 2008. Last time I was in irc comrel silenced me, from |
31 |
THEIR channel |
32 |
|
33 |
If I made such posts on a comrel list, I would be banned.... I was accused of |
34 |
spamming THEIR irc channel. Likely make the same accusation about emails. |
35 |
|
36 |
> Again, nobody here is really in a position to debate this issue. You |
37 |
> can post that another 1000x if it makes you feel better, but it isn't |
38 |
> going to be likely to cause anybody to take action on your case in |
39 |
> particular. |
40 |
|
41 |
I stopped for days, I chimed in on some specific points. But I really do not |
42 |
expect things to change in my case. Also this effects MORE than just me... |
43 |
|
44 |
> > If comrel did nothing in 2015, I would not be here posting. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> And your recourse is to appeal. You haven't exhausted your options |
47 |
> with the process as it currently stands. |
48 |
|
49 |
Appeal what? |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |