Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-scm@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Council / Git Migration Agenda | ||
| Date: | Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:58:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_mozsMoK6juqO8nHoDcJixP+mz3wcsX5zVcGgiitdNjUw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Council / Git Migration Agenda by Dirkjan Ochtman |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Can we do that without requiring the git replace stuff? E.g. have |
| 4 | > dev.git be a shallow clone of a joined-history.git? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | That was the original plan I suggested abandoning in my email, for the |
| 8 | reasons stated in my email. None of them had to do with repository |
| 9 | size, actually, though having a repository with an obsolete 1.5GB |
| 10 | history embedded certainly isn't ideal. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Council / Git Migration Agenda | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |