| 1 |
On 10/07/14 06:58, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Can we do that without requiring the git replace stuff? E.g. have |
| 4 |
>> dev.git be a shallow clone of a joined-history.git? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> That was the original plan I suggested abandoning in my email, for the |
| 7 |
> reasons stated in my email. None of them had to do with repository |
| 8 |
> size, actually, though having a repository with an obsolete 1.5GB |
| 9 |
> history embedded certainly isn't ideal. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> -- |
| 12 |
> Rich |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
What does a shallow clone mean exactly? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 20 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 21 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 22 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives