| 1 |
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 11:37:48 AM EDT NP-Hardass wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Go take a breather. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Read two emails back. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Just miss-read some of what you were saying. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I proposed that the Foundation endorse the Council/GLEP 39 officially at |
| 10 |
> this time. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You then complained that I was talking about limiting or expanding the |
| 13 |
> power of the Foundation. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Endorsing the Council, is essentially unifying the structure. Saying the |
| 16 |
Foundation has power over the Council. Which many will disagree with because |
| 17 |
they see the structure as being different. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Many will see that as an expansion of the Foundation power. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I restated that I said that the Foundation would endorse the |
| 22 |
> Council/GLEP 39. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In order to do such, it would likely have to include aspects of GLEP 39 into |
| 25 |
the By Laws. It would likely not be as simple as it seem. But again in doing |
| 26 |
so your making it official that the Trustees oversee the Council. Many are not |
| 27 |
ok with that. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> You respond by saying that I am making absolute statements about the |
| 30 |
> current situation. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Just misread one bit. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> Chill out, and think, and read before you respond. You are just hurting |
| 35 |
> yourself and this whole conversation right now. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Its called distracted, this is not my primary focus. What you perceived as |
| 38 |
heated, tempered etc. Is just rushed per juggling. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
As for hurting myself, so great harm has already been done over the years. I |
| 41 |
am not concerned. Plus as the saying go, things cant improve till you reach |
| 42 |
rock bottom. I am mining... |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives