| 1 |
On 05/12/2017 03:41 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Freitag, 12. Mai 2017, 10:52:01 CEST schrieb Roy Bamford: |
| 3 |
>> On 2017.05.12 00:07, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 4 |
>> [snip] |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> I'd be open to a trial -- try it out for a few months and see what |
| 7 |
>>> happens. I have a feeling I'll be right and activity will plummet, but |
| 8 |
>>> the only way to know for sure is to try it. Then nobody can argue over |
| 9 |
>>> it because we'll have facts to work with. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Just my 2ยข. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Its been tried and and was judged a failure by a past council. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And the number of people who are still around from back then is not that big |
| 17 |
> anymore. |
| 18 |
> In addition, if you are going to cite prehistory (roughly 9 years ago) here, |
| 19 |
> let me correct you... (1) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> * The proctors team was indeed considered a failure and disbanded back then; |
| 22 |
> in my opinion that went rather idiotically, with lots of egos clashing. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> * The council back then agreed that |
| 25 |
> -> gentoo-dev should be moderated for non-@gentoo adresses |
| 26 |
> -> gentoo-project should be created to attract all the bikeshedding |
| 27 |
> interpersonal flamebaits ... |
| 28 |
> Thus gentoo-project came into being. And suddenly it was so quiet on gentoo- |
| 29 |
> dev that the moderation proposal seemed unnecessary... |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> (1) As you know I've been reading the logs and at least part of the archived |
| 33 |
> mail. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Thank you both for the bit of insight. If we've already tried this and |
| 37 |
it didn't work, history suggests it will be ineffective at best. |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
| 40 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 41 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives