| 1 |
Am Freitag, 12. Mai 2017, 10:52:01 CEST schrieb Roy Bamford: |
| 2 |
> On 2017.05.12 00:07, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 3 |
> [snip] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I'd be open to a trial -- try it out for a few months and see what |
| 6 |
> > happens. I have a feeling I'll be right and activity will plummet, but |
| 7 |
> > the only way to know for sure is to try it. Then nobody can argue over |
| 8 |
> > it because we'll have facts to work with. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Just my 2¢. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Its been tried and and was judged a failure by a past council. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And the number of people who are still around from back then is not that big |
| 16 |
anymore. |
| 17 |
In addition, if you are going to cite prehistory (roughly 9 years ago) here, |
| 18 |
let me correct you... (1) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
* The proctors team was indeed considered a failure and disbanded back then; |
| 21 |
in my opinion that went rather idiotically, with lots of egos clashing. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
* The council back then agreed that |
| 24 |
-> gentoo-dev should be moderated for non-@gentoo adresses |
| 25 |
-> gentoo-project should be created to attract all the bikeshedding |
| 26 |
interpersonal flamebaits ... |
| 27 |
Thus gentoo-project came into being. And suddenly it was so quiet on gentoo- |
| 28 |
dev that the moderation proposal seemed unnecessary... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
(1) As you know I've been reading the logs and at least part of the archived |
| 32 |
mail. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 36 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives