| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> An area that always bothered me was stage3 building, but I think our |
| 6 |
>> catalyst docs have improved. I don't know if following the wiki guide |
| 7 |
>> leads to a stage3 identical to our published one or not... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Rich, please make an effort to ask the correct people before making such |
| 10 |
> comments that can be misread as meaning that the RelEng team is building |
| 11 |
> stages "in secret" or questioning how anyone can be certain about what is |
| 12 |
> built. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The only comments I made were: |
| 15 |
1. IN THE PAST I was concerned about stage3 building. |
| 16 |
2. Things have improved. |
| 17 |
3. I am unsure if following the wiki guide leads to a stage3 |
| 18 |
identical to our published one or not. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
All three remain just as true after your comments. :) I'm certainly |
| 21 |
interested in clarification on the last one. It isn't actually enough |
| 22 |
to publish a repo full of files - you also have to document how you |
| 23 |
use them. That may very well already be documented in the Catalyst |
| 24 |
wiki page. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
As far as "misreading" goes - people will read what they want to read |
| 27 |
into just about anything that anybody says. I try to clearly state |
| 28 |
what I mean, and I'm sure I do it imperfectly. If somebody isn't sure |
| 29 |
what I mean, they're more than welcome to talk to me about it. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Rich |
Archives