Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:48:26
Message-Id: assp.0125808372.3247119.rnz8Rreypy@wlt
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by Daniel Campbell
1 On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:08:28 PM EST Daniel Campbell wrote:
2 >
3 > Does comrel have its hands in that many
4 > cookie jars? If so, something is very wrong with that picture. The most
5 > powerful groups in Gentoo are given their power on the condition that they
6 > meet re-election and are accountable to what amounts to constituents
7 > (devs and/or foundation members).
8
9 Comrel is essentially the most powerful entity in Gentoo. Comrel is the
10 gatekeepers of Gentoo. Comrel controls who gets in, who goes out, how people
11 are seen... Comrel takes action against someone, most will assume that person
12 did something wrong.
13
14 Comrel has no oversight. There is no qualification to be part of that team.
15 There is no accountability or anything. Comrel has no terms. Some have been
16 members of comrel since I left in 2008.
17
18 The worst part, Comrel controls who are members of Comrel, They have kicked
19 people out of Comrel... How someone can become part of Comrel, or the entire
20 team be replaced. GOOD LUCK!!!
21
22 Council and Foundation will have to fight Comrel to change Comrel....
23
24 --
25 William L. Thomson Jr.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature