1 |
Would an election be something important enough to post to g-announce@l.g.o? |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Hi, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 15:51:23 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: |
8 |
> > On Sat, 08 Jul 2017 18:20:40 +0200 |
9 |
> > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > > Cast your vote! Let's make this one a record participation election! |
12 |
> > > Less than 8 hours left... |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Elections/Council/201706 |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I somehow managed to completely overlook the elections starting, and by |
18 |
> > the time I got around to checking my copious amounts of email, and had |
19 |
> > free time to delve into the swamp lands of -project, .... well, the |
20 |
> > elections had already closed. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > I'm not about to demand a recount or anything, but I felt a little |
23 |
> > ripped off that I managed to overlook something so seemingly important. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > Perhaps in future elections, Wilikins can be rigged to send a /notice |
26 |
> > at least once to every #gentoo-* channel, both when elections open, and |
27 |
> > within a certian threshold of when they close? |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Or perhaps send a /privmesg 's to every developer both: |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > 1. When elections open ( or the first time the dev appears online in a |
32 |
> > gentoo channel after elections open ) |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Better to use Wilikins for this, the same way as Wilikins note |
35 |
> service works: when dev performs some action, because just joining |
36 |
> the channel may be done automatically (e.g. during startup or |
37 |
> reconnection after network problem) and message may be lost. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> > 2. Every 5 Hours of the last 24 hours of the election window. |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > ( The latter mostly being the most practical way I could think of to |
42 |
> > counteract timezone effects and client-cycles losing the notice ) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> People may consider this as spam. It may be acceptable to message |
45 |
> only those who had not yet voted, but no more. IMHO better to do |
46 |
> this 3 days, 2 day and 1 day before the deadline. Every 5 hours may |
47 |
> be irritating and chances are high that dev will not be available |
48 |
> during the last day for one reason or the other (ISP failure, power |
49 |
> failure, too busy IRL, travelling, etc). |
50 |
> |
51 |
> > Because I think ideally we aught to be encouraging participation in |
52 |
> > voting as much as practical. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Actually we have a personal warning using MOTD on dev.gentoo.org. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Best regards, |
57 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
58 |
> |