1 |
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Nick Vinson <nvinson234@×××××.com> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Criminal Case. The defendant may appeal a guilty verdict, but the |
6 |
>> government may not appeal if a defendant is found not guilty. Either |
7 |
>> side in a criminal case may appeal with respect to the sentence |
8 |
>> that is |
9 |
>> imposed after a guilty verdict. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Source: |
12 |
>> http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/types-cases/appeals |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> So in short, if you are found not-guilty in a lower court it's over. |
15 |
>> There's nothing more the US government can do. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Well, the US government does lots of dumb things... :) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> However, verdicts generally aren't issued by a judge in the US. |
21 |
> They're usually issued by juries, and this is part of why they're not |
22 |
> appealable. We don't really have juries in Gentoo. I'm not convinced |
23 |
> having them would make things better. |
24 |
|
25 |
The constitution forbids issues of fact from being appealed once made |
26 |
by juries, except "according to common law". |
27 |
|
28 |
Issues of fact (as opposed to issues of law) in general are given great |
29 |
deference to the trial court by the appeals process. |
30 |
|
31 |
As far as "juries", in essence comrel itself acts as a jury. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> Rich |
36 |
> |