| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
@dberkholz |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
- From your manifesto: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I continue to believe that technical advances are, and should be, |
| 9 |
> driven by individuals. Given our volunteer culture, a council can't |
| 10 |
> force people to do things they don't want to do, but it can help |
| 11 |
> to break up disputes and roadblocks, and make global decisions when |
| 12 |
> needed. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Do you think that gentoo is consistent in it's behavior? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Should the council step in without any1 asking them if there are |
| 17 |
changes about to happen that are a) global and b) highly controversial |
| 18 |
discussed? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
As an example: multilib. The council was not involved in that decision |
| 21 |
between eclass vs multilib-portage. Since any1 is allowed to add |
| 22 |
eclasses to the tree the decision was somehow implicit, without any |
| 23 |
real consensus on what the course should be. |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRx2iKAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzU8QH/0FF4OSMB2jcBqJnHFWLgdGK |
| 29 |
zopByu4MYKrCgh2vkVVJFohdfgNrGk0XqDIMXQ5Mc4qJSSnuGdHCQd2WbyaGpUT/ |
| 30 |
VFo3NcMl2XUmzV/6XRmlc1QxfIymHsbnHl6GU/QPkBl/tUMBJrE2fd2TOZK1moCr |
| 31 |
POdzH0eUqbzTs1kafX/htb+H/+uZ6gu4uelovaGSnP4q+bYzuxZBEk+QGedrS+5o |
| 32 |
BSHBtg7lLz3RuEksj7mNdVEy8K6BWeUBlUOX6p1M86rsqr95Yr//Qc58O/lLe39X |
| 33 |
cQVd7ZDNcDO+iiv5uZNJlQgVL3rxfrtrC+o53JTY8HJ2P5l6Oh1E8iXucrimszg= |
| 34 |
=ijU/ |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives