1 |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:38 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 08:03 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
4 |
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:33:09 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
6 |
> > > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:43:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > On Sun, 2019-06-16 at 23:00 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > > Only active Gentoo developers who are also Foundation members may be |
9 |
> > > > > > nominated. [1] |
10 |
> > > > > > |
11 |
> > > > > > Nominations MUST be made by posting to gentoo-nfp@l.g.o, and |
12 |
> > > > > > the nominated candidate must accept not later than the end of the |
13 |
> > > > > > nomination period. |
14 |
> > > > > |
15 |
> > > > > Ok, let's try someone else. I nominate: |
16 |
> > > > > |
17 |
> > > > > David Seifert (soap) |
18 |
> > > > > Mikle Kolyada (zlogene) |
19 |
> > > > |
20 |
> > > > You violated the rules: |
21 |
> > > > Nominations MUST be made by posting to gentoo-nfp@l.g.o |
22 |
> > > > |
23 |
> > > > But you sent them to gentoo-project@l.g.o mail list. |
24 |
> > > > Hereby they are not valid. Please perform your duty properly and |
25 |
> > > > send nominations to the aforementioned NFP mail list. |
26 |
> > > > |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > You could also have understood it was a honest mistake and be nice about |
29 |
> > > it. But I suppose that's too much to expect from a ComRel member. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > I politely pointed out your mistake and nicely asked you to fix it. |
32 |
> > I even used the word "please". I honestly don't see what was not |
33 |
> > nice about my previous e-mail. Maybe we have a language barrier |
34 |
> > issue here. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > My comrel membership has nothing to do with this discussion and |
37 |
> > I'm participating in it as a common Gentoo developer with my comrel |
38 |
> > hat off. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Do you really believe that a ComRel member (read: a person whose duty |
42 |
> involves judging other people's behavior) can just take ComRel hat off |
43 |
> and stop caring about providing exemplary behavior? Following that |
44 |
> logic, I could join ComRel claiming that all the things I've said |
45 |
> and done were 'with my comrel hat off' (since I don't have any)! |
46 |
> |
47 |
> I understand that there might be a language barrier. However, since you |
48 |
> decide to perform a very specific and important role, I'm afraid you |
49 |
> need to learn to use English in a way that's actually polite rather than |
50 |
> using the excuse of a language barrier. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Let me explain. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> A neutral (i.e. not really polite but acceptable) way of saying that |
55 |
> would be to say 'you have posted the nominations to the wrong list'. |
56 |
> That's plain and factual. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> You said 'you violated the rules' which is an accusation. Accusations |
59 |
> tend to render one as guilty of doing something very bad. Accusations |
60 |
> are not polite. |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Furthermore, 'perform your duty properly' is passive aggressive. Adding |
63 |
> 'please' doesn't make it any more polite -- in fact, given just before |
64 |
> a insulting statement it may have the exact opposite effect. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> The polite way of saying that would be to strip the first part |
67 |
> of the sentence and just say 'please send nominations ...' In fact, |
68 |
> as you can see the passive aggressive part is completely unnecessary to |
69 |
> convey the meaning, so what's the purpose of adding it besides |
70 |
> intentionally offending someone? |
71 |
|
72 |
As a native English speaker I agree with Michał's assessment. |