| 1 |
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:59:49 AM EST Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On second thought, I think that under the board there will still be a |
| 4 |
> council for general technical matters that you would still be electable |
| 5 |
> towards. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think in any merge it would be best to keep existing structure, just unify |
| 8 |
and have means for them to work together rather than in their own silo. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> In the next version of this (1.1) I think I'm leaning towards |
| 11 |
> the 'board' being what is currently trustees + hr(comrel) + pr + infra. |
| 12 |
> Under that would go what is currently being done by council. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I think rich0 proposed the merged board having the functionality of both |
| 15 |
> council and trustees, but I'm not sure that'd work with your concerns. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think merging Trustees and Council is a mistake. It would reduce any checks |
| 18 |
and balances, and combine focus of the two bodies, possibly getting less done. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I see the Council as more running the project, and Trustees overseeing such, |
| 21 |
helping where they can, etc. Each can have their own roles duties, but the |
| 22 |
Council still being the main/core entity leading the project technically. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives