| 1 |
On 01/11/2017 01:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> 9. Members of the 'board' having conflicts with their job. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> I'm, not sure about this as it's likely case by case. But I |
| 7 |
>> personally don't see this causing much more issues than what is |
| 8 |
>> already caused by working on an open source project. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It is causing more issues. I need no special permission to serve on |
| 11 |
> the Council. However, law [1] doesn't allow me any activity in an |
| 12 |
> "organ" of a corporation, even if that activity is non-paid. I suspect |
| 13 |
> that getting permission for this could take a long time, since there |
| 14 |
> may be no precedent for U.S. (or New Mexico) nonprofit corporations. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> IIUC, dilfridge is in a similar situation. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Ulrich |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> [1] Landesbeamtengesetz of Rhineland-Palatinate, § 83 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Nr. 2 |
| 21 |
> http://landesrecht.rlp.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=BG+RP&psml=bsrlpprod.psml |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
On second thought, I think that under the board there will still be a |
| 25 |
council for general technical matters that you would still be electable |
| 26 |
towards. In the next version of this (1.1) I think I'm leaning towards |
| 27 |
the 'board' being what is currently trustees + hr(comrel) + pr + infra. |
| 28 |
Under that would go what is currently being done by council. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I think rich0 proposed the merged board having the functionality of both |
| 31 |
council and trustees, but I'm not sure that'd work with your concerns. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives