| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 04:59:49 -0600 |
| 2 |
Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01/11/2017 01:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> >> 9. Members of the 'board' having conflicts with their job. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >> I'm, not sure about this as it's likely case by case. But I |
| 10 |
> >> personally don't see this causing much more issues than what is |
| 11 |
> >> already caused by working on an open source project. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > It is causing more issues. I need no special permission to serve on |
| 14 |
> > the Council. However, law [1] doesn't allow me any activity in an |
| 15 |
> > "organ" of a corporation, even if that activity is non-paid. I suspect |
| 16 |
> > that getting permission for this could take a long time, since there |
| 17 |
> > may be no precedent for U.S. (or New Mexico) nonprofit corporations. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > IIUC, dilfridge is in a similar situation. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Ulrich |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > [1] Landesbeamtengesetz of Rhineland-Palatinate, § 83 Absatz 1 Satz 2 Nr. 2 |
| 24 |
> > http://landesrecht.rlp.de/jportal/?quelle=jlink&query=BG+RP&psml=bsrlpprod.psml |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> On second thought, I think that under the board there will still be a |
| 28 |
> council for general technical matters that you would still be electable |
| 29 |
> towards. In the next version of this (1.1) I think I'm leaning towards |
| 30 |
> the 'board' being what is currently trustees + hr(comrel) + pr + infra. |
| 31 |
> Under that would go what is currently being done by council. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I'm sorry but I feel like I'm completely lost here. If the board is not |
| 34 |
actually to be a separate entity, then what is changing exactly? |
| 35 |
And what's the problem being solved, now? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Best regards, |
| 39 |
Michał Górny |
| 40 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives