Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms

[Rich Freeman]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 8:25 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote:
> On 13/11/16 01:22, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 11/13/2016 02:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 11, 2016 7:22:19 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>> That really reeks of micromanagement to me.  We don't have Council
>>>> approve individual appointments in any team currently, and the Comrel
>>>> lead already has the power to add/remove anybody from the team as
>>>> needed.
>>> No other project in Gentoo is controlled like that. Any developer can join any
>>> team without approval. It is not right that Comrel get's to choose who gets to
>>> be part of Comrel. Also that Comrel can remove members from that team/project.
>>>
>> " The QA team lead must approve developers who would like to join the
>> project. The applicant must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the
>> duties he would like to perform. By accepting the applicant the QA team
>> lead will accept the responsibility to direct them as part of the team
>> and will be held responsible for any action the team member takes on
>> behalf of the QA team."
>>
>>
> ^^ This sounds like a perfectly workable equivalent that could be
> applied to Comrel .. thoughts??
>

That seems to be the general thinking right now.  Back when these
changes were made to QA it was generally discussed that at some point
it probably wouldn't hurt to apply these to Comrel, and possibly Infra
as well.

-- 
Rich