Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v3]
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 23:38:49
Message-Id: 20180909023840.64ee52e4b32139f90e05b997@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v3] by Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 20:55:03 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 08 Sep 2018, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 15:35:58 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> # Real names must be provided for all developers, including > >> # infrastructure and documentation. Any exceptions to this for > >> # extenuating circumstances will be considered on a case-by-case > >> # basis. No exceptions will be made for people doing copyrightable > >> # work (ebuilds, software, scripts, documentation, etc.). > > > Real names must be provided != must be publicly available. The > > current status is that they are in LDAP, but not viewable outside > > of recruiters (and maybe some other limited groups). > > The list of active developers at > https://www.gentoo.org/inside-gentoo/developers/ (which AFAIK is > generated from LDAP) doesn't suggest any such cases. I see one name > which seems to be a pseudonym (a name of a character from a comic), > but that person is not an ebuild developer. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:NP-Hardass If this sounds like real name to you... With git access of course.
> > What you are proposing demands public availability, so it can be seen > > as an extra requirement compared to GLEP. > > Ulrich
Best regards, Andrew Savchenko

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v3] Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>