| 1 |
Actually, somebody has an overlay focused on GitLab ebuilds. I used it for a bit at work, but it was too much of a resource hog for the server I was allowed. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Otherwise, it was quite nice. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On June 14, 2018 8:33:32 PM EDT, Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>On 2018-06-14 16:14, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 7 |
>> They seem to offer docker packages, so we could just nab those and |
| 8 |
>run |
| 9 |
>> them in containers on hosts. I'm not too keen on doing a bunch of |
| 10 |
>> (really what I consider busywork) to try to 'get it working on |
| 11 |
>Gentoo.' |
| 12 |
>> We already use upstream provided containers and I expect that to |
| 13 |
>> continue as upstreams continue to abandon the 'release packages' |
| 14 |
>model |
| 15 |
>> and move to 'release sets of containers' model. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>Huh? Is this the Gentoo-way? I hope not! :( |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>No, I really hope something like that will never happen. Like I hope we |
| 20 |
>will never see the attempt to add "FLATPAK", "Snap"... to the official |
| 21 |
>Gentoo repository. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>-- |
| 25 |
>Regards, |
| 26 |
>Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 27 |
>C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
Archives