| 1 |
On 4/9/19 11:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:46 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> If you are to provide anything related to this, I'd suggest also |
| 5 |
>> providing (i) a template copyright assignment document that assigns the |
| 6 |
>> copyright of any work to the foundation (will only be valid in countries |
| 7 |
>> where this is allowed, including US), and (ii) a policy document when |
| 8 |
>> the real name can be disclosed when needed (e.g in a court case |
| 9 |
>> disputing the copyright). |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I think that this is starting to go off on a tangent, but a lot has |
| 13 |
> already been done on that front using the FSFe FLA as a starting |
| 14 |
> point. I wouldn't suggest that somebody just create something from |
| 15 |
> scratch. (And for those who are worried, the general thinking to date |
| 16 |
> is that it would be 100% voluntary.) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> That said, I really don't see how assignment helps here. I suggest |
| 19 |
> taking any discussion around that to a separate thread unless there is |
| 20 |
> a clear tie-in, and I don't think this is a direction Council is |
| 21 |
> likely to go in anyway. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
if the foundation approves pseudonym actors, an assignment from said |
| 25 |
person could have legal bearing but the identify wouldn't necessarily |
| 26 |
need to be immediately disclosed except an additional tag that the |
| 27 |
person has signed an assignment document. of course that presumes that |
| 28 |
the rationale for pseudonym isn't copyright avoidance to begin with. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 32 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 33 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives