| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 25/07/13 20:31, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> I think according to our philsophy and social contract we should |
| 6 |
> make people aware of free software and because of that also change |
| 7 |
> the default to: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ACCEPT_LICENSE="@FREE" |
| 10 |
I agree. Is the BSD mess where some binaries had LICENSE="BSD" |
| 11 |
cleared up? If not these will still be pulled in with @FREE, even if |
| 12 |
they are obviously nonfree. This will have to be documented (or |
| 13 |
preferably just fixed). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Additionally I think the about[0] or the philosophy[1] page should |
| 16 |
mention *what* free software is and *why* the user should care. |
| 17 |
Presently they only say that Gentoo *is* and *uses* free software. |
| 18 |
This foregoes a chance to educate the user on free software. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[0] <http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml> |
| 21 |
[1] <http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/philosophy.xml> |
| 22 |
- -- |
| 23 |
Alexander |
| 24 |
alexander@××××××.net |
| 25 |
http://plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlHxc6YACgkQRtClrXBQc7XikgD+Kt9u1kWniGhzWJuHDD56K314 |
| 31 |
NdGN22JjdT5XhuljxG4A/0zVE5zzUO0wGbjX1lvBsGa4Ers5NQVrY3G5MtfZRPdw |
| 32 |
=QlzT |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives