| 1 |
On 18/07/17 22:23, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:12:45 +0100 |
| 3 |
> "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I think mgorny was doing some general commit stats, and I have yet to |
| 6 |
>> compile my own, but it would be very interesting to see how many |
| 7 |
>> 'active' team members there were in any given project. I suspect the |
| 8 |
>> results could be very telling ... |
| 9 |
> Its not even like they're "inactive", they're just not active *in the team*. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> For some, there's no reason for them to devaway: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> - They're on IRC |
| 14 |
> - They commit daily |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> But they're on teams they seldom do things in. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This is probably more true the more teams you're on. |
| 19 |
Then why are you 'in' the team.. I mean, there's one thing to idle on an |
| 20 |
IRC channel, but membership does normally imply some form of |
| 21 |
contribution, no? Or is it just to make you 'look' |
| 22 |
interested/popular/part-of-the-furniture .... |
Archives