Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] The problem of defunct and undermanned projects in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:23:50
Message-Id: 20170719092317.7ba9beee@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] The problem of defunct and undermanned projects in Gentoo by "M. J. Everitt"
1 On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:12:45 +0100
2 "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote:
3
4 > I think mgorny was doing some general commit stats, and I have yet to
5 > compile my own, but it would be very interesting to see how many
6 > 'active' team members there were in any given project. I suspect the
7 > results could be very telling ...
8
9 Its not even like they're "inactive", they're just not active *in the team*.
10
11 For some, there's no reason for them to devaway:
12
13 - They're on IRC
14 - They commit daily
15
16 But they're on teams they seldom do things in.
17
18 This is probably more true the more teams you're on.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] The problem of defunct and undermanned projects in Gentoo "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>