| 1 |
On 11/10/16 17:48, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Comrel chooses to get involved when they need not be. They had no reason to |
| 3 |
> get involved in 2015, or since 2008. They did not need to get involved and |
| 4 |
> take action in 2008. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> That is the root of the entire problem. They choose to interject when they are |
| 7 |
> not needed or wanted... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If comrel did nothing in 2015, I would not be here posting. If they did |
| 10 |
> nothing in 2008, I would never have left. This is all because of their |
| 11 |
> involvement, not their resolution... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
Stepping in on a topic that I know little about, but from a related |
| 15 |
subject that irks me significantly.... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Willliam: propose a (viable) change to policy that the council can vote |
| 18 |
on. The discussion on what is passed, is definitely that. If you have |
| 19 |
lodged an appeal to due process to Council, or if you think that some |
| 20 |
part of Gentoo acted illegally, take advice, and address the Trustees. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
rich0 has started a perfectly reasonable discussion as to explore some |
| 23 |
of the 'warts' if you like .. of the ComRel body, and how it may be |
| 24 |
Improved. It is the emphasis on the latter that is likely to make a |
| 25 |
difference going forward, and allows the possibility (and at this stage |
| 26 |
it is Only Possibility) that the status quo may be Re-evaluated against |
| 27 |
new policy. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
In proposing new changes, we must Justify why we feel these changes are |
| 30 |
necessary - not so much how they affect the Past, but how they will |
| 31 |
improve Gentoo for the Future. Examples are valid, but need to be |
| 32 |
presented in a factual matter. Simply getting angry and upset is likely |
| 33 |
to galvanise others against you, and make your plight harder to further. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Just my 2c. And a dollar thrown in. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Michael/veremit. |
Archives