| 1 |
On 12/05/2013 09:04 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Welcome Michael! What herds will you be working with? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks. I haven't joined any yet, but there are a few I'm interested in. |
| 7 |
And some of those I have the ability to help out. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Interest: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
* emacs |
| 12 |
* hardened (hi) |
| 13 |
* haskell |
| 14 |
* net-mail |
| 15 |
* php |
| 16 |
* sci(-mathematics) |
| 17 |
* sysadmin |
| 18 |
* webapps |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Interest and ability: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
* emacs |
| 23 |
* haskell |
| 24 |
* net-mail |
| 25 |
* php |
| 26 |
* sysadmin |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The first big thing on my todo list (once the semester is over) is bug |
| 29 |
#410451 [1]. After that, I'll probably sign up for more responsibility. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I would really like to chat with the webapps team some time; we use a |
| 32 |
number of off-the-shelf web applications, but not in a way that |
| 33 |
webapp-config supports. So I have my own ebuilds for e.g. |
| 34 |
www-dependencies/piwik, which lists the deps for Piwik[2] but doesn't |
| 35 |
install anything. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I don't expect webapp-config to support every crazy configuration that I |
| 38 |
can think up, but it would be super convenient if could use the ebuilds |
| 39 |
in the tree for dependency management. Right now I'd have to |
| 40 |
INSTALL_MASK my entire web root and that would cause issues with the few |
| 41 |
web applications we do install "normally" (e.g. Mailman). |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410451 |
| 45 |
[2] http://piwik.org/ |
Archives