Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] improving alternative PM support in gentoo | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:48:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 55CF7B4C.8030004@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] improving alternative PM support in gentoo by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On 08/15/2015 01:24 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > What do you guys think about this? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Like it. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > Do you see any other things that need to be tackled in order to get |
| 9 | > there? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Getting rid of dynamic deps in portage. Until then it's too easy for |
| 12 | portage users to commit stuff that's broken to the stricter package |
| 13 | managers. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] improving alternative PM support in gentoo | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |