1 |
Hi Ulm! |
2 |
|
3 |
El 14/04/18 a las 07:59, Ulrich Mueller escribió: |
4 |
>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: |
5 |
>> Taking into account that the letter and not the spirit of GLEP 39 is |
6 |
>> usually thrown around as a weapon ("INFORMATIVE", HAH!). I strongly |
7 |
>> disrecommend having more "informative" policies. |
8 |
> Sorry, but I don't understand what you are talking about. GLEP types |
9 |
> are defined in GLEP 1 [1]: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> ,---- |
12 |
> | A Standards Track GLEP describes a new feature or implementation |
13 |
> | for Gentoo Linux. An Informational GLEP provides general guidelines |
14 |
> | or information to the Gentoo Linux community, but does not propose |
15 |
> | a new feature. |
16 |
> `---- |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Michał's GLEP doesn't describe any new feature, but aims to document |
19 |
> current practice. Therefore it cannot be of type "Standards |
20 |
|
21 |
You are deviating the topic here. Informative GLEPs: |
22 |
* Are enforced. |
23 |
* Are accepted as a valid argument without trying to check whether their |
24 |
contents still apply (and no that doesn't mean that it is not marked as |
25 |
Replaced, Moribund or Deferred, it means that their contents are actual |
26 |
and relevant). |
27 |
|
28 |
If you want to document the current lifecycle of Gentoo Developers it's |
29 |
a better idea to, for example, go and update the Developer Handbook |
30 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:ComRel/Developer_Handbook Because |
31 |
anything that is stated in a GLEP will be enforced even if said GLEP is |
32 |
"informative". |
33 |
|
34 |
>> As a closing note, I'm really getting tired of all this "Either you |
35 |
>> write ebuilds or you are a piece of shit" philosophy that is running |
36 |
>> on the ambient nowadays. If such people want a developer centric |
37 |
>> source based distro, who gives shit about the non developers I |
38 |
>> strongly recommend trying Exherbo instead. |
39 |
> This is not helpful. |
40 |
|
41 |
Having second class contributors isn't either and that is exactly what |
42 |
this GLEP proposes. |
43 |
|
44 |
Klondike |