| 1 |
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 23:35 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 16:43 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:33:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Hey all, |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I just found out while I was on vacation about Github's copilot feature. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Basically, it appears to be a machine learning feature that trains |
| 9 |
> > > itself on all publically available code on github and provides |
| 10 |
> > > code suggestions to any public or private repository. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > https://github.com/features/copilot |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > There appears to be a lot of controversy around it in foss groups, so I |
| 15 |
> > > thought it might be worth bringing up here. I added the council and |
| 16 |
> > > trustees because I thought it might be worth bringing to their attention |
| 17 |
> > > as well. In particular, I see concerns about gpl projects being on github |
| 18 |
> > > if they can't opt out of this. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > It looks like the SFC is urging foss developers to ditch github over |
| 21 |
> > this. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/01/open-source-developers-urged-to-ditch-github-following-copilot-launch/ |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > William |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Although I don't work for GitHub specifically, it would still not be |
| 28 |
> appropriate for me to wade far into this debate. In the interest of keeping |
| 29 |
> things balanced though, I'll start and finish by referencing this |
| 30 |
> counter-opinion. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/11/robots_open_source/ |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Having slept on it, I'd like to add that I don't have any problem at all with |
| 35 |
us moving to GitLab. I'm just as familiar with that as I am with GitHub. I |
| 36 |
just want us to do it for the right reasons. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Chewi |
Archives