| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:39 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 26/03/18 02:36, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 8:40 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera |
| 4 |
>> (klondike) <klondike@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> "Comments by selected people are welcome. " |
| 6 |
>> And this would be why I've maintained that having non-overlapping |
| 7 |
>> Council/Trustees is a problem waiting to happen. We have two |
| 8 |
>> governing bodies that disagree and continue to escalate things, in |
| 9 |
>> part because we don't allow an overlap in membership and there are |
| 10 |
>> only so many people interested in either job to go around. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Pardon me for asking, but isn't this completely tangential to the topic |
| 14 |
> at hand? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That's a pretty good description of this thread, which I imagine is |
| 18 |
why the Council hasn't been in a mad rush to tweak the social |
| 19 |
contract. The arguing over closing the lists hasn't even died down |
| 20 |
yet... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives