Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: GLEP 76
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:47:38
Message-Id: 20190618154732.GA31015@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: GLEP 76 by Luca Barbato
1 On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 05:43:17PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > On 18/06/2019 16:12, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:49:33PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
4 > >> In my opinion GLEP 76 is the most controversial decision made by
5 > >> running council. While it fixed some long standing issues like
6 > >> copyright headers and proper acknowledgement of out of the tree
7 > >> contributors, it created grave problems: now some long-time
8 > >> contributors and even developer are seriously discriminated because
9 > >> they want to keep their privacy.
10 > >
11 > > I only know of one developer who this affected, so I don't see it as
12 > > that big of an issue.
13 >
14 > Well all the developers are affected by the extra steps needed to push.
15
16 I'm not sure what extra steps you are referring to, I just answered this
17 in regard to the pseudonym issue.
18
19 Thanks,
20
21 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature