1 |
On Thu, 11 May 2017 15:57:52 -0400 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> We don't want people to avoid us. |
4 |
|
5 |
I myself have been there and done that. I left for many years. |
6 |
Very few things if anything improved. I was even accused of not doing |
7 |
more over those years. Despite how people handicap my ability to |
8 |
contribute. Which I stopped some time ago. |
9 |
|
10 |
My recent activity on Github was simply trying to address |
11 |
contributors that Gentoo Developers were ignoring... |
12 |
|
13 |
This person ignored for 11 months. Does this guy sound happy? Did |
14 |
anyone other than me reply to address his concerns? |
15 |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1721#issuecomment-300155991 |
16 |
|
17 |
Good reason for me to be blocked from Github right? What does that say |
18 |
to that guy? I had NOTHING to do with Gentoo Devs ignoring that pull |
19 |
request. |
20 |
|
21 |
Why is this one still open? Mgorny has superior skills to my pathetic |
22 |
ones. Why does he not merge that request? Why has Chewi not? |
23 |
Anyone even talking to the contributor? |
24 |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1358 |
25 |
|
26 |
While that pull request addresses a number of Tomcat bugs. There are |
27 |
still many more Tomcat related bugs people are reporting. |
28 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tomcat&list_id=3530490 |
29 |
|
30 |
What about this guy? Did anyone reach out to him? |
31 |
He showed in IRC as well.... |
32 |
http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=149194941632740&w=2 |
33 |
|
34 |
Those are just a few and all 3 have NOTHING to do with me. That is |
35 |
Gentoo Developers neglecting their own contributors. Upsetting them and |
36 |
driving them away. Do you think any of them will contribute more? |
37 |
|
38 |
I feel bad for all three.... They were not treated right! |
39 |
|
40 |
> If somebody looks at our list archives and see lots of flames, they |
41 |
> may be discouraged from participating. |
42 |
|
43 |
Rarely will chaos drive someone away from a superior product and |
44 |
offering. More so if one is technically superior to another. If such |
45 |
does they then were not interested in the technical aspects or did not |
46 |
consider them superior. |
47 |
|
48 |
Why do I still run Gentoo after how I am treated and seen? For |
49 |
technical reasons clearly not social. |
50 |
|
51 |
> If somebody posts a bug and somebody replies saying that xyz on |
52 |
> Gentoo is dead and that you'd be better off on another distro, |
53 |
> they'll probably take that advice ensuring xyz remains dead. Etc. |
54 |
|
55 |
Or when the bug and/or fix for said issue goes ignored for a very long |
56 |
time. It shows that the Distro is being neglected. That alone will |
57 |
drive people away. Even if a package is alive, it can be dead on a |
58 |
given distro. |
59 |
|
60 |
> It is a bit of "we will not hide problems" vs "not hiding problems |
61 |
> actually causes those problems." Suicide by social contract? |
62 |
|
63 |
People are intuitive and can see problems hidden or not. |
64 |
|
65 |
Gentoo Developers and people within are creating FAR more problems than |
66 |
anyone on the outside.... There are 3 clear examples above. Where is |
67 |
the clear example of say my actions driving another away? Any evidence? |
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |