| 1 |
Dnia 12 lutego 2016 23:34:50 CET, "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 2 |
>On 2/12/16 5:22 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Therefore, I would like to ask for Council's help on this issue. I |
| 6 |
>see |
| 7 |
>> the possible following actions that would help the cause: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> a. officially refusing the 'dynamic slot' request [2] so that it |
| 10 |
>would |
| 11 |
>> not be used to block fixing the QA violations indefinitely, |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> b. setting an official deadline on fixing the remaining violations |
| 14 |
>> and making the calls fatal. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> [1]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566518 |
| 17 |
>> [2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174407 |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>I was aware of, but haven't really thought through, toolchain.eclass |
| 21 |
>use |
| 22 |
>of use* in global scope. Do you have a solution? I'm okay with |
| 23 |
>putting |
| 24 |
>pressure on developers but if its a technically difficult problem, I'd |
| 25 |
>rather be part of the solution than the problem. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
There was a number of possible alternatives discussed on the future EAPI bug. So far with no real consensus. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |
Archives