Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Some focus for Gentoo | ||
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:31:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 54B6E025.2070206@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Some focus for Gentoo by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On 01/13/2015 07:43 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | > Wanted to share my thoughts on where I think Gentoo should go, in terms |
| 3 | > of direction. Would love to hear your thoughts. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > http://dberkholz.com/2015/01/13/gentoo-needs-focus-to-stay-relevant/ |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I think that improved binary package support will allow Gentoo to |
| 9 | compete with binary distros, making Gentoo applicable to a much wider |
| 10 | audience. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | I am currently working on an new binary package repository (PKGDIR) |
| 13 | layout [1] and binary package soname dependencies [2] (soname deps will |
| 14 | require us to establish a naming convention for multilib ABI identifiers |
| 15 | [3]). |
| 16 | |
| 17 | [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/5031 |
| 18 | [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94145 |
| 19 | [3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94176 |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | Thanks, |
| 22 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Some focus for Gentoo | "Amadeusz Żołnowski" <aidecoe@g.o> |