| 1 |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:28:07 -0400 |
| 2 |
Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I admit that I had some initial negative feelings when I saw that the |
| 5 |
> only less popular option than myself was reopening nominations, but I |
| 6 |
> got over it after realizing that people's opinions were none of my |
| 7 |
> business. I had refrained from making unsolicited statements on my |
| 8 |
> positions in the belief that someone should ask first, but none did. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It appears that the Council stayed nearly the same; iotw, the community |
| 11 |
confirms that they want the current Council to continue doing what |
| 12 |
they've been doing (or give them a second chance or ...). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Given that, I'm fine with where I am in the sorting; especially since |
| 15 |
they pursue a goal similar enough to what I wrote down in the manifesto. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You can consider to look at this from the positive side; given |
| 18 |
master-council-201406 you can see that some people rank you high, |
| 19 |
especially this time with confs-council-201406 you can see which people |
| 20 |
rank you high. It can be of a surprise to you... :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
With kind regards, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 26 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 29 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 30 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives