1 |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: |
6 |
>>> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <wk@×××××××××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> For good measure, I'd like to nominate these guys: |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> To avoid any "legal technicalities" do these nominations actually |
11 |
>>> count? The announcement said "anyone can nominate" but I'm not |
12 |
>>> sure if this was intended to be limited to current devs. I don't |
13 |
>>> think it really matters since devs can always nominate themselves, |
14 |
>>> but I'd hate to see somebody accept and then get called out on it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> Our rules are very clear: anyone can nominate and it's ok to |
17 |
>> nominate oneself. |
18 |
>> However, they also state that nominations must be accepted. So only |
19 |
>> the nominees that accept will be running for the election. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Right, anyone can nominate. However, if someone is nominating everyone |
22 |
> who is eligible (with the exception of one developer), then I would |
23 |
> see this as a clear abuse of the rule. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> So, to make sure if I understand this right, you do consider these |
26 |
> nominations as valid? |
27 |
|
28 |
As an election official I need to abide by the rules, so yes, all of those |
29 |
nominations are valid. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Ulrich |
32 |
|
33 |
Regards, |
34 |
Jorge. |