Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: pinkbyte@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:04:38
Message-Id: 20130612140513.7ccd24a6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by Sergey Popov
1 Dnia 2013-06-12, o godz. 15:54:29
2 Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > But you know about "Assignee" field in bugzilla, do not you? Maintainer
5 > in this terms is "Assignee", co-maintainer(s) goes in CC field.
6
7 I'd rather call that a technical limitation of Bugzilla rather than
8 anything specific.
9
10 Of course, there are cases when there's an agreement that there's main
11 maintainer and co-maintainers, main maintainer and specific area
12 maintainers and so on. But it's a result of people's decisions
13 and agreements, and not of Bugzilla being limited.
14
15 --
16 Best regards,
17 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>