Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 06:51:46
Message-Id: 3def6731-f040-5309-1552-d7aa362fdf8a@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 11/12/2016 05:14 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Thursday, November 10, 2016 7:01:33 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >>
4 >>
5 >> If there is no Comrel wouldn't that be leaving the job to Council?
6 >
7 > Problem resolution is first and foremost supposed to be handled by Team Lead.
8 > Only in severe cases brought to Comrel. which need not exist. So without that,
9 > it would be Council, only in very rare cases.
10 >
11 > The KEY being TEAM LEADS, which are sorely lacking all around in Gentoo. Team
12 > Leads resolve any issues within their project. If a problem crosses projects,
13 > Team Leads from each project work together to resolve said issue.
14 >
15 > Team Leaders work directly with those and have better knowledge of the
16 > individuals, their lives, and the impact on Gentoo. Comrel is complete
17 > detached and lacks this crucial information and connection.
18 >
19 > I had a real issue in the past, which Robin H Johson <robbat2> being Team
20 > Lead, resolved and it NEVER made it to Comrel. What did make it to Comrel
21 > years later was a joke... Given members of Comrel took direct part in the
22 > problem, a direct conflict of interest.
23 >
24 Hit the nail square on the head. Thanks for putting it into fewer words
25 than I could; it reads a lot better.
26
27 --
28 Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
29 OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
30 fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature