1 |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:10 PM M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> I have no problem with people |
4 |
> talking with authority (IANAL excepting), but if anyone is actively OR |
5 |
> passively refusing to disclose their sources, is it really unreasonable |
6 |
> to ask someone to justify their arguments? |
7 |
|
8 |
Well, you should have a problem with people talking with authority if |
9 |
they aren't justifying their arguments, whether they disclose sources |
10 |
or otherwise. Certainly they can cite arguments made elsewhere |
11 |
without repeating them, but titles don't convey rightness. |
12 |
|
13 |
Besides, if we required formal certifications to contribute to Gentoo, |
14 |
I bet half our developers would be disqualified. We probably have as |
15 |
many physics majors as CS majors on the rolls from my observations. |
16 |
|
17 |
As far as I'm aware nobody on this list is a lawyer, and we have |
18 |
varying levels of professional and informal involvement in |
19 |
legal/business/compliance activities (serving on boards, dealing with |
20 |
contracts, working in regulatory/compliance, etc). So, take |
21 |
everything with a grain of salt. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Rich |