Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 07:27:02
Message-Id: 20151010092644.388f3f5a.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 01:34:07
2 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA512
6 >
7 > Am Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015, 20:48:31 schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
8 > > On 10/08/2015 10:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
9 > > > Potential alternative is to back-mirror pull requests in
10 > > > git.gentoo.org and work on that. But that's likely to cause even more
11 > > > uproar.
12 > >
13 > > Why would this be a problem? Suppose we copy the "gentoo.git" directory
14 > > on git.gentoo.org to "gentoo.github" or something like that.
15 > >
16 >
17 > Sure (just let's use a separate repo for it since not everyone wants to
18 > download all these blobs forever). It's not so 100% clear cut though, since
19 > with pull requests a force push to update it is more or less the norm, meaning
20 > the history gets lost.
21
22 Git *does not* download all refs by default. Putting pull requests
23 in gentoo.git won't affect the common fetch.
24
25 --
26 Best regards,
27 Michał Górny
28 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>