1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
Am Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015, 20:48:31 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: |
5 |
> On 10/08/2015 10:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
> > Potential alternative is to back-mirror pull requests in |
7 |
> > git.gentoo.org and work on that. But that's likely to cause even more |
8 |
> > uproar. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Why would this be a problem? Suppose we copy the "gentoo.git" directory |
11 |
> on git.gentoo.org to "gentoo.github" or something like that. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Sure (just let's use a separate repo for it since not everyone wants to |
15 |
download all these blobs forever). It's not so 100% clear cut though, since |
16 |
with pull requests a force push to update it is more or less the norm, meaning |
17 |
the history gets lost. |
18 |
|
19 |
In combination with some sort of notification archiving (shove it into |
20 |
archives.gentoo.org) that should be fine though. |
21 |
|
22 |
- -- |
23 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
24 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
25 |
dilfridge@g.o |
26 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
29 |
|
30 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGE7vAAoJEB9VdM6hupKVBLMP/i1ctW9GrDTAAot4PhID0/c1 |
31 |
aEkm5+6a9nBCKSYoRLbb4XBu2XsGIBYaijBwr39baq3HYrfD2AvY7SdY0Blv8CZX |
32 |
6Wiwd+i+5KDVgInvRwhiI4j5ksjiC9kmx6dr1lexMfgzdRZFCbK4N100DtGKAaJ3 |
33 |
NU/oLT5cYI8RzNMUSE7yR5OKuVuvEpMmX1ZOfm/tWbwQ7B3HEnLXFhh1HZ3Gtj0U |
34 |
lQp77J+XA9qfzNOIy5uIPty97fTXcieIvDhalj0T2UMbK6/3b/AiXEdzt02bQW6V |
35 |
Zj4K381Z3UrZPPh1EpW8SKJ1B8Cd1UrMyzhYy2mnlDigFLwOc/vG51uhsO+7/0rw |
36 |
lJI5wQkleDt+oEEg6YcvrddvXD0PQxx9BtUQzaC3KKH3BxNiCMFweINJXOTH/+Jv |
37 |
N28+uH2VCH6XXqy0zYdGz5UvHNDZi/WXhMclPca0ngOy8aoCx7JuDDKZsjpgjEyi |
38 |
Ph14SGTF5B9wTagwcuv4+B6swMwax2fpg1LoZT4UeDiabJsjzKLTSUzZAnTKkuny |
39 |
GbJPghwhwDuI09qrlKeHACXHPIWKIzETSNwF69HHDnRNnNrwYpCvkvVv0aTHkg/6 |
40 |
gbOPDtxSHRAercE9qX+KGONOpgW9I/pyZ9j59ABKDboJOdxSn0KUs8E0NBnKsQxB |
41 |
0CAomFGfmToeFbaRnFtV |
42 |
=1UM2 |
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |