1 |
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:55:31PM -0700, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
2 |
> This is exactly why my opinion is strongly in favor of having the |
3 |
> situation, whatever it may actually be, documented so that people who |
4 |
> might get burned by having their stuff exposed by legal action will at |
5 |
> least have advanced warning. |
6 |
The "protected" information in the case of forums would be limited to |
7 |
private messages, and any private user information that was not exposed |
8 |
elsewhere (eg IP address, hidden email address). Everything else on the |
9 |
forums is a public posting, and thus not granted any protections. |
10 |
|
11 |
The case that really worries me is IRC private messages. There are |
12 |
generally only two parties with logs, which are likely to be the |
13 |
plaintiff and defendant previously mentioned. (Both parties have an |
14 |
interest in altering the messages). In most cases [1], the messages go via |
15 |
one or more Freenode servers, which could in theory log them, and also |
16 |
complicate the privacy jurisdiction question. |
17 |
|
18 |
[1] IRC does have ways to directly message another person without it |
19 |
going through servers; said ways originate in file tranfers between |
20 |
parties and are much less common today. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
24 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer |
25 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
26 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
27 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |