Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008]
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 01:12:28
Message-Id: 482E30EF.4090207@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > So you're saying the Council is free to entirely ignore the rules under
3 > which it was elected, and instead say "We are now supreme dictators for
4 > life"?
5 >
6
7 I think that there is a balance somewhere between supreme dictators for
8 life and needing to have new elections because a few people didn't
9 notice that the very-rare non-regular council meeting got scheduled.
10
11 If Gentoo were a corporation it would have bylaws governing these sorts
12 of issues and they'd be far more detailed than GLEP 39. Legally the
13 council doesn't have any meaning as it doesn't control any tangible
14 assets - so such matters really don't need to apply.
15
16 The principle is one of openness and representative democracy. I don't
17 think we sacrifice that by letting the current council finish its term.
18
19 The council governs with the consent of the developers - nobody is
20 disputing this. If the council loses the support of the developers it
21 would be appropriate to choose a new council - which is a better option
22 than pulling an XFree86 and watching all the devs just form their own
23 new distro. However, I don't really see any evidence that anybody at
24 all is unhappy with the council (even those calling for the new
25 elections aren't expressing any dissatisfaction with the current council).
26
27 To me this is like running a stop sign in the middle of nowhere with a
28 wide open view and no cars in sight. I probably wouldn't do it, and I
29 can see why it is technically wrong, but I don't think I could really
30 say that anybody who runs the sign is doing harm to society by doing so.
31 Policies should serve the distro and the developers - not the other
32 way around.
33
34 Maybe we just won't see eye to eye on this - that's OK I suppose. If
35 lots of people really want new elections then let's have them. However,
36 to me it just seems like a waste and I don't think we're obligated to
37 hold them just because 3-4 people have called for them.
38 --
39 gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list

Replies