| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Sure, the Trustees have no authority over these volunteers -- as long as |
| 4 |
>> they are not operating under the Gentoo name, Gentoo infrastructure, Gentoo |
| 5 |
>> repos, not using the Gentoo logo, Gentoo domains, etc. They are totally |
| 6 |
>> free to leave the project which is run by the Trustees, and then the |
| 7 |
>> trustees have no authority over them. But as long as they are on a project |
| 8 |
>> called "Gentoo Linux", the trustees have the authority to remove assholes |
| 9 |
>> from the project if they so desire. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Cool, if you want the name, maybe we should just negotiate selling it back |
| 13 |
> to you so you can do whatever with it? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Nice snarky non-sequitur. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What I want is for Gentoo members to understand the role of the Trustees. |
| 19 |
So far, it seems that ulm and you are both openly hostile to the concept of |
| 20 |
trustees, and yet you operate in a project that is run by trustees. So, |
| 21 |
while I could reply in turn with a snarky comment like "suck it", or |
| 22 |
whatever, I will instead say that I tend to try to side with reality, |
| 23 |
because reality always wins. Unless of course, you choose to engage in mass |
| 24 |
delusion, which is always an option as well. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-Daniel |
Archives