From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news | ||
Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:58:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 20170123055755.45a4b6e9@katipo2.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
1 | On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:21:12 -0500 |
2 | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Corporate sponsors will only sponsor Gentoo if they have a direct benefit. |
5 | > Right now with how Gentoo is. There is no reason for anyone to give Gentoo |
6 | > money, individual or corporation. |
7 | |
8 | People reading the newsletter seeing that a company sponsored it both makes |
9 | people more aware that a company exists, and gives them confidence that the company |
10 | cares enough about opensource to sponsor it. |
11 | |
12 | And this makes opensource preferring people more likely to choose that company. |
13 | |
14 | How do you think The Perl Foundation has money to pay for developing things? |
15 | |
16 | Oh. They have sponsors, and they're listed: https://metacpan.org/about/meta_hack |
17 | |
18 | Note: All of these companies have some mutualistic involvement. |
19 | |
20 | And there's this: http://pythonchallenge.org/sponsors-and-partners/ |
21 | |
22 | This: https://us.pycon.org/2015/sponsors/ |
23 | |
24 | This: http://www.rubyconf.org/sponsors |
25 | |
26 | This: https://jaxlondon.com/sponsors-exhibitors/ |
27 | |
28 | There is direct benefit: Being seen is a direct benefit. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |