Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:58:24
Message-Id: 20170123055755.45a4b6e9@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 11:21:12 -0500
2 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Corporate sponsors will only sponsor Gentoo if they have a direct benefit.
5 > Right now with how Gentoo is. There is no reason for anyone to give Gentoo
6 > money, individual or corporation.
7
8 People reading the newsletter seeing that a company sponsored it both makes
9 people more aware that a company exists, and gives them confidence that the company
10 cares enough about opensource to sponsor it.
11
12 And this makes opensource preferring people more likely to choose that company.
13
14 How do you think The Perl Foundation has money to pay for developing things?
15
16 Oh. They have sponsors, and they're listed: https://metacpan.org/about/meta_hack
17
18 Note: All of these companies have some mutualistic involvement.
19
20 And there's this: http://pythonchallenge.org/sponsors-and-partners/
21
22 This: https://us.pycon.org/2015/sponsors/
23
24 This: http://www.rubyconf.org/sponsors
25
26 This: https://jaxlondon.com/sponsors-exhibitors/
27
28 There is direct benefit: Being seen is a direct benefit.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Rekindling Gentoo News -> Paying for news "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>